Skip to content
[wa_login login_label="Log in"]
  • Home
  • Welcome from the Conference Chair
  • Keynote Addresses
    • Is Sustainability Rocket Science?
    • Working Together: Fishers, Civil Society, and Academia Build Research and Policy Outcomes on Collective Action
    • Nurturing The Urban Commons
  • Video Presentations
    • When The Past Rears Its Head: Technocratic Visions of Urban Development and The Coopting of Urban Commons
    • From “Kere” to Tank: Changing perceptions of water as an urban commons
    • Role of Self-help Groups as Agents for Local Participation and Service Provision in Peri-urban Villages: The Case of Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India
    • Urban Commons and Placemaking: Exploring Diverse Socio-ecological Linkages With Lake Commons in Bangalore
    • Cognitive Factors Affecting Multi-scale Collaboration Around Common-pool Resources
    • Taming Surface and Groundwater Use for Irrigation: A Commons’ Problem
    • Social tipping elements for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050
    • “Tragedy of the Commons” as Conventional Wisdom in Sustainability Education
    • From Tragedy to Survival
    • Journey from Tragedy to Survival: Co-Ordination Problems in Polycentric Governance
    • Cross-border Governance: Polycentricity in Practice?
    • Comparative Institutional Analysis of Digital Communities: A Review
    • Making corporations a common good to sustain the global common goods
  • Commons Video Contest
  • World Commons Week Reports
    • Commons @ASU during World Commons Week
    • Commons Study Booming in China: Chinese Scholars Celebrating the First World Commons Week
    • Seminar “The Lens of the Commons” at the Procomum Institute in Brazil
    • The Brazil’s Commons Seminar: The Faxinal Tradition
  • Conversation Corner
    • Participate
[wa_login login_label="Log in"]
  • Home
  • Welcome from the Conference Chair
  • Keynote Addresses
    • Is Sustainability Rocket Science?
    • Working Together: Fishers, Civil Society, and Academia Build Research and Policy Outcomes on Collective Action
    • Nurturing The Urban Commons
  • Video Presentations
    • When The Past Rears Its Head: Technocratic Visions of Urban Development and The Coopting of Urban Commons
    • From “Kere” to Tank: Changing perceptions of water as an urban commons
    • Role of Self-help Groups as Agents for Local Participation and Service Provision in Peri-urban Villages: The Case of Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India
    • Urban Commons and Placemaking: Exploring Diverse Socio-ecological Linkages With Lake Commons in Bangalore
    • Cognitive Factors Affecting Multi-scale Collaboration Around Common-pool Resources
    • Taming Surface and Groundwater Use for Irrigation: A Commons’ Problem
    • Social tipping elements for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050
    • “Tragedy of the Commons” as Conventional Wisdom in Sustainability Education
    • From Tragedy to Survival
    • Journey from Tragedy to Survival: Co-Ordination Problems in Polycentric Governance
    • Cross-border Governance: Polycentricity in Practice?
    • Comparative Institutional Analysis of Digital Communities: A Review
    • Making corporations a common good to sustain the global common goods
  • Commons Video Contest
  • World Commons Week Reports
    • Commons @ASU during World Commons Week
    • Commons Study Booming in China: Chinese Scholars Celebrating the First World Commons Week
    • Seminar “The Lens of the Commons” at the Procomum Institute in Brazil
    • The Brazil’s Commons Seminar: The Faxinal Tradition
  • Conversation Corner
    • Participate

To watch this video please log in with your IASC credentials.

Not an IASC member yet?  Please follow this link to see membership options and benefits.

Cognitive Factors Affecting Multi-scale Collaboration Around Common-pool Resources

Luisa Galindo
University of Massachusetts Amherst

Abstract

Despite the effort to promote participative processes in the construction of policies, building functional polycentric and nested institutions remain a major challenge. Collaboration is fundamental to advance in the articulation of multi-scale instruments, the flow of information, grow of trust, and ultimately social learning, however, differences in the cognitive structures within groups of stakeholders is a major hurdle.

This research uses a survey to establish what cognitive variables impede collaboration between local and regional stakeholders in the Orinoco River Watershed, South America. This instrument captures information about the ideas and perceptions that four different groups of actors (Indigenous peoples, Non-Indigenous communities, Researchers, and Federal employees) have about use behavior, governance, and management of common-pool resources. Major cognitive differences between actors are tested using chi-square and the topologies of interaction are defined through social network analysis.

It was found that horizontal differences between groups of actors at the local scale are larger than at regional scales (40% and 10% respectively), also, Indigenous peoples have the largest cognitive differences. Despite this, all groups agree that larger opportunities for the protection of common-pool resources are found within Indigenous territories. The findings from this research indicate that indirect use of resources is a major obstacle impeding the interaction between local groups, this, together with differences in the perceptions about management practices, set Indigenous peoples completely isolated from the three remaining groups. Field observations and interviews revealed the material causes for such separation. The results from this research can help decision makers to identify and further exploring bridging opportunities and policies to improve conditions for better interaction between multi-scale actors.

Do you have questions about this conference? Please contact us at iasc@asu.edu

IMA_LOG_IASC_Logo-white

International Association for the Study of the Commons

Made with 🧡 by Pfister Lab