Skip to content
[wa_login login_label="Log in"]
  • Home
  • Welcome from the Conference Chair
  • Keynote Addresses
    • Is Sustainability Rocket Science?
    • Working Together: Fishers, Civil Society, and Academia Build Research and Policy Outcomes on Collective Action
    • Nurturing The Urban Commons
  • Video Presentations
    • When The Past Rears Its Head: Technocratic Visions of Urban Development and The Coopting of Urban Commons
    • From “Kere” to Tank: Changing perceptions of water as an urban commons
    • Role of Self-help Groups as Agents for Local Participation and Service Provision in Peri-urban Villages: The Case of Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India
    • Urban Commons and Placemaking: Exploring Diverse Socio-ecological Linkages With Lake Commons in Bangalore
    • Cognitive Factors Affecting Multi-scale Collaboration Around Common-pool Resources
    • Taming Surface and Groundwater Use for Irrigation: A Commons’ Problem
    • Social tipping elements for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050
    • “Tragedy of the Commons” as Conventional Wisdom in Sustainability Education
    • From Tragedy to Survival
    • Journey from Tragedy to Survival: Co-Ordination Problems in Polycentric Governance
    • Cross-border Governance: Polycentricity in Practice?
    • Comparative Institutional Analysis of Digital Communities: A Review
    • Making corporations a common good to sustain the global common goods
  • Commons Video Contest
  • World Commons Week Reports
    • Commons @ASU during World Commons Week
    • Commons Study Booming in China: Chinese Scholars Celebrating the First World Commons Week
    • Seminar “The Lens of the Commons” at the Procomum Institute in Brazil
    • The Brazil’s Commons Seminar: The Faxinal Tradition
  • Conversation Corner
    • Participate
[wa_login login_label="Log in"]
  • Home
  • Welcome from the Conference Chair
  • Keynote Addresses
    • Is Sustainability Rocket Science?
    • Working Together: Fishers, Civil Society, and Academia Build Research and Policy Outcomes on Collective Action
    • Nurturing The Urban Commons
  • Video Presentations
    • When The Past Rears Its Head: Technocratic Visions of Urban Development and The Coopting of Urban Commons
    • From “Kere” to Tank: Changing perceptions of water as an urban commons
    • Role of Self-help Groups as Agents for Local Participation and Service Provision in Peri-urban Villages: The Case of Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India
    • Urban Commons and Placemaking: Exploring Diverse Socio-ecological Linkages With Lake Commons in Bangalore
    • Cognitive Factors Affecting Multi-scale Collaboration Around Common-pool Resources
    • Taming Surface and Groundwater Use for Irrigation: A Commons’ Problem
    • Social tipping elements for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050
    • “Tragedy of the Commons” as Conventional Wisdom in Sustainability Education
    • From Tragedy to Survival
    • Journey from Tragedy to Survival: Co-Ordination Problems in Polycentric Governance
    • Cross-border Governance: Polycentricity in Practice?
    • Comparative Institutional Analysis of Digital Communities: A Review
    • Making corporations a common good to sustain the global common goods
  • Commons Video Contest
  • World Commons Week Reports
    • Commons @ASU during World Commons Week
    • Commons Study Booming in China: Chinese Scholars Celebrating the First World Commons Week
    • Seminar “The Lens of the Commons” at the Procomum Institute in Brazil
    • The Brazil’s Commons Seminar: The Faxinal Tradition
  • Conversation Corner
    • Participate

To watch this video please log in with your IASC credentials.

Not an IASC member yet?  Please follow this link to see membership options and benefits.

Cross-border Governance: Polycentricity in Practice?

Martin Spacek1,2, and Milan Husar1
1 Institute of Management, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava
2 Faculty of Management, Comenius University, Bratislava

Abstract

Problems and challenges emerge and develop across different jurisdictions in administrative and political units. Many of complex problems are demanding for cooperation across national borders. To address such cross-border issues better coordination is needed based on decision-making platforms which go beyond current hierarchical governance systems and enable flexible interactions among actors from different sectors and governance levels.

Many innovative solutions, such as polycentric cross-border governance, aiming towards more effective coordination of cross-border activities were developed thanks to the support of EU territorial cooperation schemes. Analysis of two Central European cross-border regions brings empirical evidence that polycentric governance seems to be suitable for overcoming key institutional challenges in cross-border governance.

Polycentric governance is usually based on self-organization of regional or local actors, well-defined common problem as well as around common natural resources. On the other hand, there is no systematic promotion of these institutional innovations on both sides of the border which hamper their long-term sustainability and therefore polycentric governance is an exception rather than a regular practice in cross-border cooperation in Central Europe.

 

Do you have questions about this conference? Please contact us at iasc@asu.edu

IMA_LOG_IASC_Logo-white

International Association for the Study of the Commons

Made with 🧡 by Pfister Lab